Justification and Excuse in International Law
This post was published 8 years ago. Download links are most likely obsolete. If that's the case, try asking the uploader to re-upload.
Cambridge University | English | 2018 | ISBN-10: 1107106206 | 604 pages | PDF | 41.46 MB
by Federica Paddeu (Author)
The defences available to an agent accused of wrongdoing can be considered as justifications (which render acts lawful) or excuses (which shield the agent from the legal consequences of the wrongful act). This distinction is familiar to many domestic legal systems, and tracks analogous notions in moral philosophy and ordinary language. Nevertheless, it remains contested in some domestic jurisdictions where it is often argued that the distinction is purely theoretical and has no consequences in practice. In international law too the distinction has been fraught with controversy, though there are increasing calls for its recognition. This book is the first to comprehensively and thoroughly examine the distinction and its relevance to the international legal order. Combining an analysis of State practice, historical, doctrinal and theoretical developments, the book shows that the distinction is not only possible in international law but that it is also one that would have important practical implications.
About the Author
Federica Paddeu is the John Tiley Fellow in Law at Queens' College, Cambridge and a fellow at the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, Cambridge.
If you want to support me buy premium account from my links.
Quick check before we show the links
Helps us keep automated scrapers from hammering the filehosts.
